crowd people, people walking the street, woman in focus, mask, QFT, QuantiFeron, immune response
Thierry Bernard, Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director

We need a huge push to prevent Phi, Rho and Sigma

The Omicron variant is spreading around the world and SARS-CoV-2 infections are rising sharply in the US as the next wave of the virus takes hold thanks to the holiday season of traveling and hugging (and traveling again). Omicron is the world’s fifth “variant of concern” in the space of a year. Despite all our efforts to socially distance, test for infections and get vaccinated, the virus continues to outpace us. We are not learning from experience.

A new variant is, once again, complicating the pandemic. The studies suggest Omicron is much more transmissible than the last-dominant Delta variant and that it can reduce vaccine efficacy (after the two shots we’ve all come to know) to a third or a quarter. This means unvaccinated people are even more at risk of catching the coronavirus and that we will see more and more breakthrough cases among the vaccinated. Infections will rise sharply.

One answer is to vaccinate more of the unvaccinated and to give those who have had two shots a third one, the booster jab. But we all know how divisive an issue vaccination has become in the US – and how the nation is lagging and will probably continue to lag behind other countries as a result. With 62 percent of the population vaccinated twice and 20 percent three times, the US is ten points behind most European countries on each count.

QIAstat Dx, Syndromic Testing, Respiratory Panel, Cartridge,
icon_0059_quote_bubble-s
Genetic surveillance, broad vaccination and proper testing finally have to go hand in hand. Only this trio together can beat SARS-CoV-2 in all its variants.
Thierry Bernard, Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director

The right test at the right time

The second answer is testing – of the right kind at the right time. President Joe Biden pledged to quadruple the supply of at-home rapid coronavirus tests to 200 million a month from December. But Americans should not solely rely on these. Home tests that check for virus-specific proteins called antigens are estimated to misidentify 15 percent of infections as so-called false negatives. They are not as reliable as molecular PCR tests analyzed in labs.

Relying heavily on home testing means the US will continue to lag behind the virus’ mutation. It is a partial solution that cannot identify infection clusters or new variants as they appear. It can only serve as a complement to PCR testing. PCR can detect the tiniest viral traces very accurately – and also signal whether people who test positive have Omicron by looking for the so-called S gene that is only present in older variants.

One problem with testing could be capacity. The USA is currently recording about 1.6 million tests a day using PCR technology, but media reports suggest Biden officials worry demand to could easily surge to three-to-five million tests a day by the end of January. Quickly doubling testing supply will take a concerted effort by the US government and the diagnostics industry – and tripling it will be an even bigger challenge still.

COVID-19, wastewater testing, viral RNA, extraction, RNA detection, RNA quantification, digital PCR
icon_0059_quote_bubble-s
Home tests that check for virus-specific proteins called antigens are estimated to misidentify 15 percent of infections as so-called false negatives. They are not as reliable as molecular PCR tests analyzed in labs.
Thierry Bernard, Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director

Learning from our mistakes

This leads to the third answer. As good as testing can be as a short-term reaction to new waves of the virus, we need to put much greater emphasis on long-term genetic surveillance of SARS-CoV-2. All credit to the South African scientists who first unraveled the genomic make-up of Omicron using so-called next-generation sequencing (NGS). But by the time they managed this feat, the new variant was already making its way around the world.

Learning from our mistakes would mean spotting the almost inevitable Phi, Rho and Sigma variants before they have traveled from their source across the globe. This means making a huge investment in public-health infrastructure, so that every country in the world can sequence positive virus samples to catch mutations as early as possible. Omicron shows us that we need to increase global surveillance to finally get ahead of the coronavirus.

Infectious disease, ID, virus infection, sterile bench, mask
icon_0059_quote_bubble-s
Learning from our mistakes would mean spotting the almost inevitable Phi, Rho and Sigma variants before they have traveled from their source across the globe.
Thierry Bernard, Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director

A global effort is needed

The surveillance problem redoubles the message that came with vaccination. We’ll only beat SARS-CoV-2 through a far-sighted worldwide effort. When it comes to NGS, much of the world remains a terra incognita, we have no idea what new variants might already abound there. The UK is sequencing 11 percent of positive cases, the US three percent, countries in much of Africa, South America and Southeast Asia between almost none and 0.5 percent.

Some scientists reckon countries should be sequencing five percent of positive cases in order to detect emerging strains when they make up one percent of all strains in the population. Others argue for sequencing 30 percent or more to catch variants even earlier. From the US to Uganda to Uzbekistan, we need huge investment in public-health infrastructure, so that countries can, for example, monitor communities’ wastewater for the virus in all its variants.

Only by spotting the appearance and spread of new variants early can we ensure that our tests, vaccines, and treatments will continue to be effective. Ramping up global genetic surveillance would give us more time to prepare for the next variant of concern – ideally even containing its outbreak locally or regionally before it fires the next global frenzy. That would help us finally beat this pandemic – and also help us prevent the next one.

icon_0059_quote_bubble-s
Only by spotting the appearance and spread of new variants early can we ensure that our tests, vaccines, and treatments will continue to be effective.
Thierry Bernard, Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director
portrait of Thierry Bernard
Thierry Bernard, Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director
Thierry Bernard is Managing Director and CEO of QIAGEN. He previously held various functions within companies in the diagnostic industry, including 15 years at bioMérieux before joining QIAGEN in 2015, initially as head of the Molecular Diagnostics business area. He has earned degrees from Sciences Po (Paris), Harvard Business School, London School of Economics and the College of Europe and is a member of French Foreign Trade Advisors.
The digital mindset is part of our DNA
About QIAGEN I Digital Transformation
The digital mindset is part of our DNA
In the age of digitization, growing businesses must digitally transform themselves to be available to their customers. The team at QIAGEN’s high-tech service center in Poland sees this as an opportunity to grow rather than something to shy away from.
Read more
Investing in cybersecurity is more important than ever
Daniel Schatz, CISO
Investing in cybersecurity is more important than ever
The last few years have seen major shifts in online threats. All companies – including those in biotech – have to take this seriously and respond.
Read more
With focus on the COVID-19 pandemic, the world has taken its eye off TB
Thierry Bernard, CEO
With focus on the COVID-19 pandemic, the world has taken its eye off TB
Tuberculosis is highly infectious and a global problem that COVID-19 has only made worse. Two legacies of the response to COVID-19 give rise to hope.
Read more
Insights from our leadership team
Our views
Insights from our leadership team

Perspectives on social and economic factors that influence our company and our industry.

Read more